By
JOHN KOZIOL
Staff Writer
LACONIA — Fines from those issued summonses during
Bike Week could more than offset the shortfall the
city incurred providing public services during the
nine-day event, according to City Manager Eileen
Cabanel.
About $20,000 could be headed into the General Fund
if everyone who was issued a summons by Laconia Police
for breaking one or more of four city ordinances
during the June 7-15 rally either pays the fines or is
found guilty in court and ordered to pay, Cabanel said
Wednesday.
The potential windfall is an unexpected blessing
for the city which had estimated that it would pay out
between $12,000-$15,000 more on police, fire and
public works services than it would recoup in site
plan and vendor license fees and other income for Bike
Week 2003.
"This is something that has been happening forever
that I don’t think the city manager knew about,"
explained Laconia Police Chief Tom Oetinger, "but
every time we write a summons for a city ordinance
violation — 365 days a year — the fine for that is
returned to the city by the (state) Administrative
Office of Courts and that has been the standard
practice for as long as I remember."
"Whether we write a summons for Motorcycle Week,
the Fourth of July or Christmas Day, if it’s a city
ordinance ... that individual, when they pay the fine,
that amount is returned in a bulk, lump payment to the
city," said Oetinger.
The bulk payment method, he said, means there is no
way to segregate out what portion of the money came
specifically from Bike Week summonses.
For Bike Week 2003, the Laconia District Court, for
purposes of greater efficiency, set fines for breaking
city ordinances ahead of time rather than processing
the summonses and then mailing notification to the
offenders, said Oetinger.
He said the fine for violating the Laconia
ordinance against drinking in public was $120; for
misuse of power (smoke shows and the like), $72;
unnecessary noise, $72; and public indecency, $300.
Laconia Police issued 252 summonses over the entire
length of Bike Week, said Oetinger, which included for
the four city ordinances as well as for the state’s
open container and disorderly conduct laws.
Oetinger said he’s never paid much attention to how
much money the city makes in fines during Bike Week
"because our purpose isn’t generating revenue but
keeping public order."
"I really don’t have a reference point because we
never looked at it from the perspective of money," he
said. Instead, "our intent is to make sure people obey
the laws," said Oetinger, "and for us to protect order
and public safety, we issue summonses."
Along with consistent enforcement of laws, the
chief said summonses are a tool to hopefully get an
ever-increasing number of people to obey the law.
For Bike Week 2003, "I think we took a much harder
enforcement line for drinking in public so I strongly
suspect that summonses for drinking in public are
strongly up but I think that pays off in the long run"
since someone who was fined for the offense once, is
less likely to make the mistake a second time,
Oetinger said.
Oetinger hopes that the result of his officers
issuing summonses for drinking in public, misuse of
power, unnecessary noise and public indecency will
have an effect analogous to the LPD crackdown on
illegal parking during Bike Week.
"Those vehicles got towed and in previous years we
towed a significant number of vehicles, but this year
the numbers were down considerably and that was a
result of people realizing that we mean business,"
said Oetinger.
In general, he continued, "if our enforcement
policy remains consistent and we hold people
accountable to the ordinances, I anticipate that as
the years go on, the summonses and number of arrests
should diminish."
Fewer illegal activities should translate to an
even safer community, said Oetinger who nonetheless
worried that some residents will try to find ulterior
motives in how the LPD issues summonses.
"My concern is people are going to think we’re
trying to raise money for the city and that’s just not
the case," Oetinger said. "Next year, hopefully people
will be a little more restrained and it’d be great to
get into a situation where we issue a minimum number
of summonses."